LLM Efficiency with a Cooling

This image demonstrates the critical impact of cooling stability on both LLM performance and energy efficiency in GPU servers through benchmark results.

Cascading Effects of Unstable Cooling

Problems with Unstable Air Cooling:

  • GPU Temperature: 54-72°C (high and unstable)
  • Thermal throttling occurs – where GPUs automatically reduce clock speeds to prevent overheating, leading to significant performance degradation
  • Result: Double penalty of reduced performance + increased power consumption

Energy Efficiency Impact:

  • Power Consumption: 8.16kW (high)
  • Performance: 46 TFLOPS (degraded)
  • Energy Efficiency: 5.6 TFLOPS/kW (poor performance-to-power ratio)

Benefits of Stable Liquid Cooling

Temperature Stability Achievement:

  • GPU Temperature: 41-50°C (low and stable)
  • No thermal throttling → sustained optimal performance

Energy Efficiency Improvement:

  • Power Consumption: 6.99kW (14% reduction)
  • Performance: 54 TFLOPS (17% improvement)
  • Energy Efficiency: 7.7 TFLOPS/kW (38% improvement)

Core Mechanisms: How Cooling Affects Energy Efficiency

  1. Thermal Throttling Prevention: Stable cooling allows GPUs to maintain peak performance continuously
  2. Power Efficiency Optimization: Eliminates inefficient power consumption caused by overheating
  3. Performance Consistency: Unstable cooling can cause GPUs to use 50% of power budget while delivering only 25% performance

Advanced cooling systems can achieve energy savings ranging from 17% to 23% compared to traditional methods. This benchmark paradoxically shows that proper cooling investment dramatically improves overall energy efficiency.

Final Summary

Unstable cooling triggers thermal throttling that simultaneously degrades LLM performance while increasing power consumption, creating a dual efficiency loss. Stable liquid cooling achieves 17% performance gains and 14% power savings simultaneously, improving energy efficiency by 38%. In AI infrastructure, adequate cooling investment is essential for optimizing both performance and energy efficiency.

With Claude

HOPE OF THE NEXT

Hope to jump

This image visualizes humanity’s endless desire for ‘difference’ as the creative force behind ‘newness.’ The organic human brain fuses with the logical AI circuitry, and from their core, a burst of light emerges. This light symbolizes not just the expansion of knowledge, but the very moment of creation, transforming into unknown worlds and novel concepts.

Data Center Operantions

Data center operations are shifting from experience-driven practices toward data-driven and AI-optimized systems.
However, a fundamental challenge persists: the lack of digital credibility.

  • Insufficient data quality: Incomplete monitoring data and unreliable hardware reduce trust.
  • Limited digital expertise of integrators: Many providers focus on traditional design/operations, lacking strong datafication and automation capabilities.
  • Absence of verification frameworks: No standardized process to validate or certify collected data and analytical outputs.

These gaps are amplified by the growing scale and complexity of data centers and the expansion of GPU adoption, making them urgent issues that must be addressed for the next phase of digital operations.

Basic of Reasoning

This diagram illustrates that human reasoning and AI reasoning share fundamentally identical structures.

Key Insights:

Common Structure Between Human and AI:

  • Human Experience (EXP) = Digitized Data: Human experiential knowledge and AI’s digital data are essentially the same information in different representations
  • Both rely on high-quality, large-scale data (Nice & Big Data) as their foundation

Shared Processing Pipeline:

  • Both human brain (intuitive thinking) and AI (systematic processing) go through the same Basic of Reasoning process
  • Information gets well-classified and structured to be easily searchable
  • Finally transformed into well-vectorized embeddings for storage

Essential Components for Reasoning:

  1. Quality Data: Whether experience or digital information, sufficient and high-quality data is crucial
  2. Structure: Systematic classification and organization of information
  3. Vectorization: Conversion into searchable and associative formats

Summary: This diagram demonstrates that effective reasoning – whether human or artificial – requires the same fundamental components: quality data and well-structured, vectorized representations. The core insight is that human experiential learning and AI data processing follow identical patterns, both culminating in structured knowledge storage that enables effective reasoning and retrieval.

Human-AI Collaborative Reasoning

This image illustrates the collaborative problem-solving process between humans and AI through reasoning, emphasizing their complementary relationship rather than a simple comparison.

Key Components and Interpretation

1. AI’s Operational Flow (Upper Section)

  • Big Data → Learning → AI Model: The process by which AI builds models through learning from vast amounts of data
  • Reasoning → Inferencing → Answer: The process by which AI receives questions and generates answers through reasoning

2. Human Role (Lower Section)

  • Experience: Knowledge and information acquired through direct experience
  • Logic: A logical thinking framework built upon experience
  • Reasoning: The cognitive process that combines experience and logic

3. Critical Interaction Mechanisms

Question:

  • Human reasoning results are input to AI in the form of sophisticated questions
  • These are not simple queries, but systematic and meaningful questions based on experience and logic

Answer:

  • AI’s responses are fed back into the human reasoning process
  • Humans verify AI’s answers and integrate them into new experiences and logic for deeper reasoning

4. Core Message

The red-highlighted phrase “humans must possess a strong, experience-based logical framework” represents the diagram’s central theme:

  • To collaborate effectively with AI, humans must also possess strong logical thinking frameworks based on experience
  • The ability to provide appropriate questions and properly verify and utilize AI’s responses is essential

Conclusion

This image demonstrates that human roles do not disappear in the AI era, but rather become more crucial. Human reasoning abilities based on experience and logic play a pivotal role in AI collaboration, and through this, humans and AI can create synergy for better problem-solving. The diagram presents a collaborative model where both entities work together to achieve superior results.

The key insight is that AI advancement doesn’t replace human thinking but rather requires humans to develop stronger reasoning capabilities to maximize the potential of human-AI collaboration.

With Claude, Gemini

Massive simple parallel computing

This diagram presents a systematic framework that defines the essence of AI LLMs as “Massive Simple Parallel Computing” and systematically outlines the resulting issues and challenges that need to be addressed.

Core Definition of AI LLM: “Massive Simple Parallel Computing”

Massive: Enormous scale with billions of parameters Simple: Fundamentally simple computational operations (matrix multiplications, etc.) Parallel: Architecture capable of simultaneous parallel processing Computing: All of this implemented through computational processes

Core Issues Arising from This Essential Nature

Big Issues:

  • Black-box unexplainable: Incomprehensibility due to massive and complex interactions
  • Energy-intensive: Enormous energy consumption inevitably arising from massive parallel computing

Essential Requirements Therefore Needed

Very Required:

  • Verification: Methods to ensure reliability of results given the black-box characteristics
  • Optimization: Approaches to simultaneously improve energy efficiency and performance

The Ultimate Question: “By What?”

How can we solve all these requirements?

In other words, this framework poses the fundamental question about specific solutions and approaches to overcome the problems inherent in the essential characteristics of current LLMs. This represents a compressed framework showing the core challenges for next-generation AI technology development.

The diagram effectively illustrates how the defining characteristics of LLMs directly lead to significant challenges, which in turn demand specific capabilities, ultimately raising the critical question of implementation methodology.

With Claude