Tag: PromptEngineering

LLM Evaluations

Posted on by lechuck park

The provided image is a flowchart diagram titled “LLM Evaluations.” It visually describes the workflow for evaluating an AI Agent’s responses and the iterative process of tuning prompts.

Here is a step-by-step description of the diagram’s flow:

  • Input Stage:
    • On the left side, there is a green block labeled “Question (Prompt).”
    • Below it, several supporting elements are listed: EVENT LOG, Config, Metrics, and Manual + @. These elements are grouped together within a light blue background, indicating they are all part of the prompt engineering or configuration process.
  • Processing Stage:
    • An arrow points from the input section to the central purple block labeled “AI Agent,” which features a cute, smiling robot icon underneath it. This shows the prompt being fed into the AI system.
  • Output & Evaluation Stage:
    • The AI Agent’s output travels via an arrow to a green block on the right labeled “Agent response Summary & Analysis.”
    • This response is directly compared (indicated by a black “VS” badge) against a grey block labeled “Answer Sheet.”
    • Attached to the “VS” badge is a blue circle that reads “By Another Agent.” This signifies that the comparative evaluation between the AI’s response and the correct answer sheet is performed automatically by a secondary AI agent.
  • Scoring & Feedback Stage:
    • The result of the comparison flows down into a large, burgundy circle labeled “SCORE.”
    • At the bottom left, there is a light blue circle labeled “Tuning Prompt.” A dashed purple arrow connects this circle directly to the “SCORE” circle, accompanied by the text “To get more .” This illustrates a feedback loop where prompts are iteratively tuned and improved to achieve better evaluation scores.
  • Additional Details:
    • In the top right corner, there is a small box containing a URL ([http://eeumee.net](http://eeumee.net)) and an email address (lechuck.park@gmail.com), likely indicating the creator or source of the diagram.

📝 Summary

This diagram illustrates the lifecycle of an automated LLM evaluation system. It shows how a prompt is processed by a primary AI agent, how the resulting response is evaluated against a golden answer sheet by a secondary AI agent to generate a score, and how that score drives the continuous tuning of the original prompt for better performance.This diagram illustrates the lifecycle of an automated LLM evaluation system. It shows how a prompt is processed by a primary AI agent, how the resulting response is evaluated against a golden answer sheet by a secondary AI agent to generate a score, and how that score drives the continuous tuning of the original prompt for better performance.

#LLM #AIAgent #PromptEngineering #LLMEvaluation #ArtificialIntelligence #PromptTuning #AIWorkflow

Rules for What We Know, AI for What We Don’t 

Posted on by lechuck park

This image presents a practical guide on how to effectively integrate Artificial Intelligence, specifically Large Language Models (LLMs), into software systems. The overarching theme is “Rules for What We Know, AI for What We Don’t,” which emphasizes using reliable, traditional computing for hard facts and reserving AI for complex reasoning and interpretation.

1. Don’t Prompt What You Can Query

This principle warns against using AI to retrieve exact data. Because LLMs generate responses based on probabilities, they can sometimes guess incorrectly or hallucinate. If you need a verified fact—like a user’s bank balance—you should use a standard database search to fetch that exact number. Once you have the accurate data, you can then pass it to the AI to draft a natural, polite response.

2. Connect the Certain, Compute the Complex

This section suggests building a hybrid approach to problem-solving. You should establish a strict, rule-based foundation (the “certain”) using traditional logic, math, or physics. Once that solid framework is in place, you let the AI operate on top of it to handle creative or flexible tasks (the “complex”). For example, use traditional software to ensure a building is structurally safe, and then use AI to design creative interior layouts within those safe boundaries.

3. LLM is the Engine, Not the Database

This final point clarifies the true role of an LLM: it is a processor, not a storage drive. You shouldn’t try to force an AI to memorize massive amounts of raw data, like a 10,000-page company manual. Instead, use a search system to find the exact page you need, and then feed just that relevant text into the LLM. The AI acts as the “engine” to read, understand, and summarize that specific information for you.

Summary

To build reliable AI applications, rely on traditional databases and strict logic for factual retrieval and structural constraints. Use LLMs strictly as reasoning and processing engines to interpret context, draft text, and solve complex problems based on the hard facts you provide them.

#AIArchitecture #LLM #ArtificialIntelligence #SoftwareEngineering #DataScience #PromptEngineering #GenerativeAI

The Start of LLM Operations

Posted on by lechuck park

This infographic, titled “The Start of LLM Operations,” illustrates the end-to-end workflow of how a Large Language Model (LLM) processes information to drive real-world outcomes.

Detailed Breakdown of the Workflow

1. Core Process Flow (Horizontal Axis)

  • Sensing: The initial stage where data is gathered based on Human Cognitive Rules. It represents the system “perceiving” the environment or requirements.
  • Input Text: Data is converted into a format that is “Easy to Read” for humans, ensuring the prompt or command is transparent.
  • LLM Engine: The central processing unit (symbolized by a high-tech gear) that analyzes the input and generates a response.
  • Output Text: The engine produces a result, again in a human-readable format, to ensure clarity before execution.
  • Action: The final stage where the output is translated into a functional task or operation.

2. Data Verification (Bottom Inset)

This section highlights the critical “Check & Balance” mechanism:

  • Input Data vs. Output Data: It shows a specific example (Product: Laptop, Quantity: 5, Shipping: Free).
  • Validation: The use of magnifying glasses and a green checkmark (Match Confirmed!) emphasizes that the output must strictly align with the input requirements to prevent hallucinations or errors.

3. Human-in-the-Loop (Right Section)

  • The image of the person reviewing a checklist (“Human Verifies the Final LLM Guide”) signifies that human oversight is the final gatekeeper. Before the “Action” is taken, a person ensures the AI’s logic and results are safe and accurate.

Summary & Insight

The diagram suggests that successful LLM operations are not just about the model’s intelligence, but about transparency and verification. By keeping data “Easy to Read” and involving “Human Verification,” the system ensures that AI-driven actions are reliable and grounded in human-defined rules.

Hashtags

#LLMOps #GenerativeAI #AIWorkflow #DataVerification #HumanInTheLoop #ArtificialIntelligence #TechInfographic #AIOperations #MachineLearning #PromptEngineering

With Gemini