Anyway, The probability

From Claude with some prompting
Traditional View: AI’s probability-based decisions are seen in contrast to human’s logical, “100% certain” decisions, and this difference could be perceived as problematic.

New Insight: In reality, the concept of human’s “100% certainty” itself might be an illusion. Human judgments are also based on limited data and experiences, making them inherently probabilistic in nature.

Finding Common Ground: Both humans and AI make decisions based on incomplete information. Even human’s logical certainty ultimately stems from restricted data, making it fundamentally probability-based.

Paradigm Shift: This perspective suggests that AI’s probabilistic approach isn’t a flaw but rather a more accurate modeling of human decision-making processes. What we believe to be “100% certainty” is actually a high-probability estimation based on limited information.

Implications: This prompts a reevaluation of the perceived gap between AI and human decision-making styles. AI’s probabilistic approach might not be inferior to human logic; instead, it may more accurately reflect our cognitive processes.

This viewpoint encourages us to see AI’s probabilistic tendencies not as a problem, but as a tool providing deeper insights into human thought processes. It invites us to reconsider how AI and humans collaborate, opening new possibilities to complementarily leverage the strengths of both sides.

The image and your interpretation together challenge the notion that human reasoning is purely logical and certain. Instead, they suggest that both human and AI decisions are fundamentally based on probabilities derived from limited data. This realization can foster a more harmonious and effective partnership between humans and AI, recognizing that our decision-making processes may be more similar than previously thought.