Traditional CPU-GPU vs CXL Key Comparison

🔴 PCIe System Inefficiencies

Separated Memory Architecture

• Isolated Memory: CPU(DDR4) ↔ GPU(VRAM) completely separated
• Mandatory Data Copying: CPU Memory → PCIe → GPU Memory → Computation → Result Copy
• PCIe Bandwidth Bottleneck: Limited to 64GB/s maximum

Major Overheads

• Memory Copy Latency: Tens of ms to seconds for large data transfers
• Synchronization Wait: CPU cache flush + GPU synchronization
• Memory Duplication: Same data stored in both CPU and GPU memory

---

🟢 CXL Core Improvements

1. Unified Memory Architecture

Before: CPU [Memory] ←PCIe→ [Memory] GPU (Separated)
After: CPU ←CXL→ GPU → Shared Memory Pool (Unified)

2. Zero-Copy & Hardware Cache Coherency

• Eliminates Memory Copying: Data access through pointer sharing only
• Automatic Synchronization: CXL controller ensures cache coherency at HW level
• Real-time Sharing: GPU can immediately access CPU-modified data

3. Performance Improvements

Metric	PCIe 4.0	CXL 2.0	Improvement
Bandwidth	64 GB/s	128 GB/s	2x
Latency	1-2μs	200-400ns	5-10x
Memory Copy	Required	Eliminated	Complete Removal

---

🚀 Practical Benefits

AI/ML: 90% reduction in training data loading time, larger model processing capability
HPC: Real-time large dataset exchange, memory constraint elimination
Cloud: Maximized server resource efficiency through memory pooling

---

💡 CXL Core Innovations

1. Zero-Copy Sharing – Eliminates physical data movement
2. HW-based Coherency – Complete removal of software synchronization overhead
3. Memory Virtualization – Scalable memory pool beyond physical constraints
4. Heterogeneous Optimization – Seamless integration of CPU, GPU, FPGA, etc.

The key technical improvements of CXL – Zero-Copy sharing and hardware-based cache coherency – are emphasized as the most revolutionary aspects that fundamentally solve the traditional PCIe bottlenecks.

With Claude